Robustness of Poisson Mixture models in identifying risk factors for Under-Five mortality in Nigeria
Background: Estimates of Under-Five mortality (U5M) have taken advantage of indirect methods but U5M risk factors have been identified using fixed statistical models with little considerations for the potentials of mixture models. Mixture models such as Poisson-Mixture models exhibit flexibility tendency, which is an attribute of robustness lacking in fixed models.
Objective: To examine the robustness of Poisson-Mixture models in identifying reliable determinants of U5M.
Methods: The data on 18,855 women used in this study were obtained from the 2008 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS). Six different Poisson-Mixture models namely: Poisson (PO), Zero-Inflated Poisson (ZIP), Poisson Hurdle (PH), Negative Binomial (NBI), Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial (ZINBI) and Negative Binomial Hurdle (NBIH) were fitted separately to the data. The Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) and diagnostic check for normality were used to select robust models. All tests were conducted at p = 0.05.
Results: The models and AIC values for U5M were: 38763.47 (PO), 38654.55 (ZIP), 44270.77 (PH), 38526.26 (NBI), 38513.71 (ZINBI) and 44269.30 (NBIH). The PO, ZIP, PH and NBIH met normality test criteria, and the ZIP model was of best fit. The model identified breastfeeding, paternal education, toilet type, maternal education, place of delivery, birth-order and antenatal-visits as significant determinants of U5M at the national level.
Conclusion: The Zero-Inflated Poisson model provided the best robust estimates of Under-five Mortality in Nigeria, while maternal education and birth-order were identified as the most important determinants. The Poisson-mixture models are recommended for modelling Under-five Mortality in Nigeria.
2. World Health Organisation. The World Health Report, Geneva, 2003
3. Espo M. Infant Mortality and its underlying determinants in rural Malawi. Dissertation, University of Tampere Medical School. 2002.
4. UNICEF, WHO, The World Bank and UN Population Division. Levels and trends of child mortality in 2006. Estimates developed by the Inter-agency Group of Child Mortality Estimation; New York. 2007.
5. Adetoro GW, Amoo EO. A statistical analysis of child mortality: Evidence from Nigeria. J Demographic Soc Statis 2014; 1: 110-120.
6. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). Nigeria: Monitoring the situation of children and women. Nigeria Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2011 Summary Report. Bureau of Statistics, Abuja Nigeria. 2011.
7. World Bank. World Development Indicators: World Bank Group. 2013. http://wdi.worldbank.org/table/2.21.
8. United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Levels and Trends of Mortality - Report 2013. UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. 2013.
9. Johnson HL, Liu L, Fischer-Walker C, Black RE. Estimating the distribution of causes of death among children age 1-59 months in high-mortality countries with incomplete death certification. Int J Epidemiol 2010; 39(4): 1103-14.
10. Bellido JG, Barcellos C, Barbosa FS, Bastos FI. Environmental sanitation and mortality associated with waterborne diseases in children Under-5 years of age in Brazil. Pan Am J Public Health: Rev Panam Salud Publica 2010; 28(2): 114-20.
11. World Bank. Health and Environment’s Background Paper for the World Bank Environment Strategy, Washington, DC: World Bank. 2001.
12. National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ORC Macro. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2003. Calverton, Maryland: National Population Commission and ORC Macro. 2004.
13. National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF Macro. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2008. Abuja, Nigeria: National Population Commission and ICF Macro. 2009.
14. Rahman Mustafizur KM, Prosannajid S. Determinants of Infant and Child Mortality in Bangladesh. Pakistan J Soc Sci 2009; 6(3): 175-80.
15. Akinyemi JO, Bamgboye EA, Ayeni O. New trends in Under-five mortality determinants and their effects on child survival in Nigeria: A review of childhood mortality data from 1990-2008. Afr Pop Stud 2013; 27(1): 25-42.
16. Hossain K, Mondal NI. A study on the health factors of infant and child mortality in Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Asian J Med Sci 2009; 1(3): 82-7.
17. Oritogun KS, Oyewole OO, Daniel OJ. Comparison of statistical models used for assessing factors associated with infant mortality in Nigeria. Ann Health Res 2016; 2(1): 37-43.
18. Hu MC, Pavlicova M, Nunes EV. Zero-inflated and Hurdle models of count data with Extra zeros: Examples from an HIV-Risk Reduction Intervention Trial. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2011; 37(5): 367-75.
19. Yesilova A, Kaydan MB. Kaya Y. Modelling Insec-egg data with excess zeros using zero-inflated regression models. Hacettepe J Math Stat 2010; 39(2): 273-82.
20. Ridout M, Demetrio CGB, Hinde J. Models for count data with many zeros. International Biometric Conference, Cape Town.1998: 1-13.
21. Achim Z, Kleiber C, Jackman S. Regression models for count data in R. J Statis Software 2008; 27(8): 1- 25. http://www.jstatsoft.org/
22. Winkler. Normality tests: Brief overview. https://brainder.org/2011/07/03/normality-tests-i/ Posted in July 2011 and accessed in July 2016.
23. Kvam PH, Vidakovic B. Nonparametric statistics with applications to Science and Engineering. Atlanta, GA: Wiley-Interscience, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publication. 2007.
24. Sprent P, Smeeton NC. Applied Nonparametric Statistical Methods. Washington, D.C, USA: Chapman & Hall/CRC. 2001.
25. Spiegel MR, Stephens LJ. Schaum’s Outline of Theory and Problems of Statistics. New York, Chicago: McGraw Hill. 1999.
26. Piza EL.Using Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression Models to measure the influence of risk on crime incident counts. 2012. Available at: www.rutgerscps.org/uploads/2/7/3/7/27370595/countregressionmodels.pdf
27. Britt C, Weisburd D. Statistical power. In: Piquero A, Weisburd D (eds.). Handbook of Quantitative Criminology. Springer; New York, NY. 2010.
28. Zorn CJW. Evaluating zero-inflated and Hurdle Poisson specifications. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association. 1996: 1-12.
29. Izugbara C. Whose child is dying? Household characteristics and U5M Nigeria. South Afr J Child Health 2014; 8(1): 16-22.
30. Kayode GA, Adekanmbi VT, Uthman OA. Risk factors and a predictive model for under-five mortality in Nigeria: evidence from Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012; 12(10): 1-11. http://www.biomedcentral.com/14712393/12/10.
31. Fayehun O, Omololu O. Ethnic differentials in childhood mortality in Nigeria. Paper presented at Detroit, Population Association of America Conference. Michigan, April 30 – May 2, 2009.
32. Rajvir S, Vrijesh T. Maternal factors contributing to Under-five mortality at birth order 1 to 5 in India: a comprehensive multivariate study. Springer Plus 2013; 2: 284. Doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-284. http://www.Springerplus.com/content/2/1/284.
33. Antai D. Regional inequalities in under-5 mortality in Nigeria: a population-based analysis of individual and community- level determinants. Pop Health Metrics 2011; 9(6): 1-10.
34. Kanmiki EW, Bawah AA, Agorinya I, Achana FS, Williams JK, Oduro AR, Phillips JF, Akazili J. Socio-economic and demographic determinants of Under-five mortality in rural Ghana. BMC Int Health Human Rights 2014; 4:24. http//www.biomedcentral.com/1472- 698X/14/24.
35. Ojikutu RK. Pattern of Under-Five deaths in Lagos State, Nigeria. Sudanese J Public Health 2008; 3(4): 176-85.
36. Antai D, Antai J. Individual- and contextual-level determinants of social inequities in under-five mortality in Nigeria: differentials by religious affiliation of the mother. World Health Popul 2008; 10(4): 38-52.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The articles and other materials published in the Annals of Health Research are protected by the Nigerian Copyright laws. The journal owns the copyright over every article, scientific and intellectual materials published in it. However, the journal grants all authors, users and researchers access to the materials published in the journal with the permission to copy, use and distribute the materials contained therein only for academic, scientific and non-commercial purposes.